Sunday, March 17, 2019
Death, Life and Identity :: essays research papers
<a href="http//www.geocities.com/vaksam/">Sam Vaknins Psychology, Philosophy, Economics and Foreign Affairs Web SitesA classical point of departure in defining Death, seems to be action itself. Death is perceived either as a cessation of breeding - or as a "transit zone", on the musical mode to a continuation of Life by other mover. While the precedent presents a disjunction, the latter is a continuum, Death being nothing only when a corridor into another plane of existence (the hereafter). Another, logically more pie-eyed approach, would be to ask "Who is Dead" when Death occurs. In other words, an identity element of the Dying (=it which "commits" Death) is essential in defining Death. But what are the opines to establish an unambiguous, unequivocal identity? Is an identity established through the office of quantitative parameters? Is it dependent, for instance, upon the number of discrete units which comprise the functioning whole? If so, where is the direct at which useful distinctions and observations are replaced by useless scholastic mind-warps? exercising if we study a human identity - should it be defined by the number and organization of its limbs, its cells, its atoms? The cells in a human torso are replaced (with the exception of the cells of the nervous system) every 5 years. Would this imply that we gain a new identity each time this cycle is completed? Adopting this demarcation of thinking leads to absurd results When humans die, the replacement rate of their cells is infinitely reduced. Does this mean that their identity is better and longer preserved once dead? No one would agree with this. Death is tantamount to a loss of identity - not to its preservation. So, a qualitative yardstick is required. We can start by asking will the identity modification - if we change someones learning ability by anothers? "He is not the same" - we say of someone with a brain injury. If a partial alt eration of the brain causes such sea change (however partial) in the determinants of identity - it seems safe to assume that a replacement of ones brain by another will result in a sum of money change of identity, to the point of its abolition and replacement by another. If the brain is the locus of identity, we should be able to assert that when (the cells of) all the other organs of the body are replaced (with the exception of the brain) - the identity will remain the same.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.