Thursday, February 28, 2019
Business Law & Ethics Essay
Consider the possible conflicts between legally doing transmission line and exchange fast- regimen, given the increasing evidence of how it is a significant contributing operator in public health, obesity, and diabetes facing many Americans. Now, based on what youve learn in this module, answer the following A) After reading the Inside drool section of Chapter 1, do you agree with how Disney Company is handling the prune? why or why not? B) Does government (federal, state, or local) have a advanced or a responsibility to get involved in this conflict? If so, what and to what limit? If not, why not? Provide sound debate for your stance and back it up with references, if possible. Your logic should be factual, not emotional. Then, rejoinder to two or more of your classmates postings (three additional postings are needed for an typic grade). See the Discussion Rubric for additional information and grading criteria. The suit of clothes involved McDonald and Disney is about chi ldhood obesity caused by many advertizement that promote fast nutrient in the United States.The McDonald Company leads the close successful advertising that drives children to obesity. Under the pressure of different sectors, Fast nutrition Company such as McDonald is required to reconsider the effect of its regent(postnominal) advertising on a childs health condition, specifically the issues of child obesity (Bagley & Savage, 2010). Disney is created for the children, then eating healthy should be a real concern regarding children to Disney. Disney and McDonald had signed a pact, and McDonald fast food is sore-eyed for children. With the growing number of child obesity, eating fast food, especially McDonald, Disney had to trail a stand in this case. I agree with how Disney is handling the issue because there were guidelines provided by Disney on how the children should eat the McDonalds food. If McDonald kids meal did not meet the requirement guidelines provided by Disney, then, Disney has the right to cease its contract with McDonald Company. The obesity problem may have short barrier effect such as noble cholesterol or high blood pressure, and long term effect such as sign 2 diabetes, stroke, several types of cancer, and osteoarthritis on those children, according to research.For example, the percentage of children time-honored 611 years in the United States who were obese change magnitude from 7% in 1980 to around 18% in 2012. Similarly, the percentage of adolescents vulcanised 1219 years who were obese increased from 5% to nearly 21% over the same period. 1, 2, and in 2012, more than one third base of children andadolescents were overweight or obese. . I believe government has both right and responsibility to get involved in this conflict because child obesity is not a small case. Because of eating morbid, children are risk of some(prenominal) types of disease, and the obesity rate is very high. Government has to regulate laws regarding children eating unhealthy food due to influential advertising promoted by fast food companies. Government needs to get involved in this conflict until there is a solution to lower calories volume provided by fast food restaurants even they do not directly tell anyone to eat their food. However, that is the source they advertise their food, so people can buy them it is a business marketing to attract customers.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.